March 26, 2004 Lancaster, California - Twenty-one years ago on April 9, 1983, I was at Kirtland AFB in Albuquerque, New Mexico, interviewing an Air Force Office of Special Investigations Agent named Richard C. Doty. I was working on a documentary special for Home Box Office entitled, UFOs: The E.T. Factor. During that meeting, Richard Doty handed me several typed pages as he said, "My superiors have asked me to show this to you. You can read the document and ask me questions, but you can't take notes." The top page said in all capitols centered on the page:
The paper summarized more than half a dozen crash retrievals of what were referred to as "extraterrestrial" aerial vehicles from a variety of locations in New Mexico, Arizona and even the nation of Mexico. The paper also referred to extraterrestrial entities, both dead and alive, retrieved from those crashed aerial vehicles and specified two kinds: small, grey beings and another kind simply referred to as "The Talls" in the briefing paper. When I asked Doty if the "Talls" were the blond types also known as "Nordics," he said yes.
The last page of the briefing paper had a list of projects that included Project Aquarius. Aquarius was described as an effort to study all extraterrestrial technology, to try to back engineer it and apply what was learned to America's own space program. While I was trying to produce that Home Box Office special, I was told by a number of sources that the retrieved extraterrestrial craft were controlled by the minds of the ET pilots through head and hand devices. I was also told that the craft were not assembled the way we do airplanes with metal sheeting and rivets. The solid silver disks were said to be grown as we would a crystal from solution. Further, I was told our government had retrieved one or more ET devices which "capture time and play it back." When I said, "Isn't that what we do when we film or videotape?" Doty said, "No, it's my understanding that the ET technology literally can replay back segments of time lines." I was also told that the ETs could travel in time.
Now, twenty-one years after that Kirtland AFB meeting, I and several others from a variety of backgrounds are meeting at the Hilton Washington Hotel in Gaithersburg, Maryland for the First Exopolitics X-Conference about testimonies and evidence that indicate one or more non-human intelligences interact with Earth life, past and present.
I will be speaking about the U. S. government's strict policy of denial about all extraterrestrial matters in the interest of national security a policy with punishment to back it up since at least the Truman Administration. I will also be presenting a workshop about the extraordinary layered bismuth and magnesium metal pieces that Art Bell and I first discussed on Coast to Coast AM radio back in 1996 which allegedly came from the bottom of a wedge-shaped craft - not a disk - retrieved on the northern White Sands Missile Range northwest of Roswell in 1947.
One of the biggest questions is how successful have American efforts to back-engineer extraterrestrial technologies been? The speaker who will address that question at the X-Conference is William Hamilton, Executive Director of Skywatch International, who works full time as a computer programmer analyst at the University of California Los Angeles. Bill has devoted his private time over the past several years to accumulating testimonies from half a dozen engineers and other scientists about back engineering efforts, both of physical aircraft design and what are called "biomorphing technologies."
An important source for some of this information was Ben Rich, head of Lockheed Corporation's famous "Skunk Works" for 16 years which concentrated on research and development of Top Secret special projects concerning aerial craft such as the F-117A and other advanced technologies.
MIND CONTROLLED ET CRAFT & ET TIME TRAVEL TECHNOLOGY
Bill Hamilton, Computer Programmer Analyst, University of California-Los Angeles, and Executive Director of Skywatch, Lancaster, California: "He (Ben Rich) was showing slides and the last slide he showed looked like a black disk coming up from the Earth and going into space. And at that point, he said to the audience: 'We now have the technology to take ET home.' That's quite a statement. A person sitting there who heard this was Jan Hartzan. He is a senior project manager at Boeing. He's also a graduate of the UCLA School of Engineering. And he's also Director of MUFON Orange County over here in California.
I thought that was significant because it definitely confirms that reverse-engineering (has occurred) I mean, when you take Ben Rich's statement and his character, his background, it is nearly unassailable.
WAS HE PHYSICALLY ALLOWED TO SEE AND ENTER AN ET CRAFT AT AREA 51?
No, but he did make the statements that the (extraterrestrial craft) were real, and positive statements that we had that technology now could only mean that he was so involved that he had to have firsthand hands-on type of experience. Why else would he make such statements?
IS THERE ANYTHING THAT IS HARDER THAT WOULD ASSOCIATE HIM HAVING FIRSTHAND EXPERIENCE WITH EXTRATERRESTRIAL TECHNOLOGY?
Just statements that he made to the engineers. For instance, they discovered that one of their equations was wrong and it was corrected, that we could travel at extremely high rates of speed to the stars and that was not a barrier. Statements like this where would those statements (come from?) He is basing those statements on technology that he knows was developed.
THE IMPLICATION WAS THAT OUR GOVERNMENT ACTIVELY HAD ALREADY IN OPERATION CRAFT FROM SOME PLACE ELSE AND THAT WE WERE GOING TO THIS SOME PLACE ELSE?
He didn't actually say we were going. He said we have the capacity to go. Why wouldn't we?
IN BILL UHOUSE'S STORY, HE WAS ACTIVELY INVOLVED IN BACK-ENGINEERING OF SOMETHING IN THE EXTRATERRESTRIAL CONTEXT, RIGHT?
Yes, he was involved in the simulators. The simulators were
built according to Bill Uhouse so that our pilots could learn
how to fly these craft. They are not jet aircraft.
Mind Controlled ET Craft
WHEN BILL UHOUSE TALKED WITH YOU ABOUT BEING INVOLVED IN SIMULATORS TO TEACH HUMANS HOW TO FLY EXTRATERRESTRIAL CRAFT, WHAT EXACTLY DID HE SAY HE WAS DEALING WITH IN SIMULATIONS?
We cannot use the methods that the extraterrestrials use to control their craft because they do a mind/body interface with the craft. But installing our own means, our own avionics, that our pilots trained on our own avionics, would be able to control the flight of these craft.
NOT WITH THOSE BANDS AROUND THEIR HEADS THAT COL. CORSO AND OTHERS HAVE DESCRIBED, BUT SOME ADAPTATION OF LITERAL ET TECHNOLOGY?
Yes, and in fact, I think they did try the headbands as far as picking up the brain waves of the pilots and amplifying those.
I believe that what happened that they have learned that the
pilots could not control their thinking processes, could not control
their intentions the way the ETs could. Therefore, it was not
a very reliable method for them to use.
Does American Government Have ET Time Travel Technology?
WHAT IS THE MOST SHOCKING OR ASTONISHING THING THAT YOU HAVE HEARD FROM PEOPLE WORKING ON BACK ENGINEERING EXTRATERRESTRIAL TECHNOLOGY?
That we have time machines, in secret. But see, that is not something I can verify. I mean, it's testimony and I try to listen for similar testimony, right, from independent sources. But it's like that's what we are left with. It's like when somebody gives testimony that they have sighted a UFO. We have testimony. If we have some documents, maybe we have gone a little further.
BUT TIME MACHINES WOULD BE PURELY SOME ONE ELSE'S TECHNOLOGY, NOT HUMAN MADE?
The person who related this information, a physicist, related that information went to repair one of the time machines. And he knew somewhat how it worked. He did not know how it was developed, or where it came from, or the source of the engineering, or whether it was reverse-engineered, or anything like that.
IF WE ARE DEALING WITH TIME AND WE HAVE PROPULSION SYSTEMS THAT CAN GET US TO OTHER SOLAR SYSTEMS, AS BEN RICH IMPLIED, WHY DO YOU THINK THAT THE GOVERNMENT IS STILL KEEPING EVERYBODY IN THE DARK?
I may know why, but I can't say. Again, it's one of those conundrums. I mean, the answer makes sense to me. I cannot verify it as the truth. It's like this: if I were to get in front of a large audience and ask, 'Would you recognize the truth if I told you?' Of course, if it is something very strange, I don't think they would. There is no way that I could let's say for a minute that I was an insider and I was to disclose the truth about what is going on that anybody would have any means of immediately verifying it just on my words alone. So, that's the conundrum."